TigerTales.Com: Search Results

TigerTales Home
Current News
News Archive
Photos
Statistics
Leader Boards
Interactivity
Golf Links
Golf News

 Search Results


Saturday, July 21, 2001

Duval cruises while Woods gardens
By BERNIE LINCICOME
Scripps Howard News Service

LYTHAM ST. ANNES, England — Tiger Woods is not going to win this British Open. David Duval just might.

Woods played the third round of the Open like a gardener, whacking at bushes and trees most of the day, while Duval strolled without pressure or expectation into a tie for the lead at six-under par with Ian Woosnam and Bernard Langer , a couple of 40-somethings with long handled putters, and German-Czech Alexander Cejka, the translation of which surely must be journeyman.

For Duval, riding an early morning 65 while the rest of the field took on British weather and their own devils later in the day, this is his least impressive competition in any of the major championships he has failed to win on the final day, though 19 golfers are within two shots of the lead. The important thing for Duval is Woods is not among them.

On a day when this shaggy, claustrophobic little golf course played like bad plumbing — everything kept backing up — it was Duval and not Woods who stepped out in front of the general swill, meaning no disrespect to Colin Montgomerie, who lead the first two rounds.

Montgomerie is in a gang of five a stroke behind. Although Woods, after a two-over par 73, is only five shots back of the lead, there are 27 players in front of him.

“I'm capable of shooting 65,” Duval said. “I mean, I just did it.”

And so he did, and without a bogey on the 15th hole, Duval would have had a record 64 and the lead all alone.

The British Open is the easiest of the four majors to win, especially for good golfers who never turn out to be great. This is Tom Weiskopf 's only major, as it is for Greg Norman. Justin Leonard won this seven years ago and instead of starting a career, it seems to have capped one. Mark Calcavecchia and John Daly — though Daly has a PGA title as well — measure their moments from beating inadequate foreigners.

This could happen for Duval, who inherits from the American press the same demands that have nagged Montgomery from the British. Why hasn't he done it already? “It is hard to say what will happen tomorrow,” Duval said. “I have no idea what the weather will be like. It might require 65 again, it might not.

“I don't know how the leaders will do but I got myself back in it today and that's where I want to be. Especially after being behind for two days.”

Duval was in a position, though not this good, to have won both majors this year. He shot 67 in the last round of the Masters and lost to Woods. He shot 74 and fell way back at the U.S. Open on the final day.

“I could have won the last four Masters,” said Duval, saying what is generally known to be true. But until he wins one of these things when everyone is watching, he will be considered a failure.

“If you look back,” said Duval, “I have been, whether you want to say fairly or unfairly criticized for Augusta. Whether you want to say I blew it this year, I shot the low round of the (final) day. The other year, I shot 67. Apparently I blew that day, too.

“I feel I've been there and I have proven I can play under these conditions. Certainly there have been times when I have not had such a good day. I shot 74 at Southern Hills. I started the day five shots behind. It turns out I would have to shoot five under.

“I know it is hard, but I know I have it in me. I think I have proven it. I have shown it. A few times I've played poorly but most of the times I've played very well.”

The world that Duval keeps peaking at is not fair. Champions must win, not merely try hard. And each time Duval fails, he rationalizes his effort.

“My end goal is to win,” Duval said. “But when you go out and do what you can and you play well, you make putts and you don't make stupid mistakes, mental mistakes, I just don't see that as failing.

“If you want to say I don't have the right attitude or if I don't have the killer instinct or whatever, I don't think finishing second at something where you have done really well is failing. I think it sends the wrong message.

“When you walk away and you look at it and you do your best, that is not failing. I did everything I could and somebody played better. I certainly want to take that trophy home tomorrow. That is, I also want to play really well.

“If I shoot 65 and I get beat, you know, I guess in some people's mind I failed again, but I just don't see how that could be the case.”

Just win, Davey.

Start or Join A Discussion about This Story

Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:

Enter their email address below:

 AP Sports Headlines


ReporterNewsHomes ReporterNewsCars ReporterNewsJobs ReporterNewsClassifieds BigCountryDining GoFridayNight Marketplace

© 1995- The E.W. Scripps Co. and the Abilene Reporter-News.
All Rights Reserved.
Site users are subject to our User Agreement. We also have a Privacy Policy.