TigerTales.Com: Search Results

TigerTales Home
Current News
News Archive
Photos
Statistics
Leader Boards
Interactivity
Golf Links
Golf News

 Search Results


 Tiger Woods

Back

Tuesday, August 29, 2000

Woods won't relinquish the stage


By Bill Lyon
Knight Ridder Newspapers
(KRT)

Probably we should have had enough of him for a while. Shouldn't we? But just about the time you think you would be Tigered out, he conjures up some new feat of daring and derring-do.

Get enough? How can you get enough when every time out — every time — he is apt to do something you've never seen before? He is the rarest thing there is in sports — you can't put a cap, a limit, a boundary, on him.

Before he is done, surely he will “persuade that little dimpled ball to sit up and speak.

It looked like a concert. And, of course, in a way it was.

Maestro Tiger Woods, using his 8-iron like a baton, made a grand and sweeping pass at the ball and elevated it a distance of 169 yards. The ball plummeted out of the night sky and plopped onto the green and stuck there like a scoop of ice cream that had slid off the cone and onto summer pavement.

Two feet from the hole.

The maestro walked the darkening 18th fairway, trying to beat nightfall home, and the gallery flicked on cigarette lighters and waved them and swayed in time to its own cheers. It could have been the Mann Center or Central Park or Woodstock.

Tiger Woods is the Fifth Beatle. And Barbra Streisand. And Arturo Toscanini.

He is Secretariat and Walter Johnson and Ted Williams.

You say, with wistful longing and sighing regret, that you never got to see Williams hit .400?
You will see the golf equivalent of it very soon.

The magic number in golf is 59.

That, it says here, will be the next great achievement of Tiger Woods.

And it is not beyond belief that one day he will shoot a 58.

We're talking Putt-Putt scores.

He's been flirting with it. He shot a 61 at Firestone on Friday, and it was ludicrously easy.

One of these days he'll get off to one of those birdie-eagle-birdie starts and he will keep it going.

This is how you know that he is the best there has ever been: There is not a single solitary record that he won't own.

Instead of having a crushing hangover and an understandable letdown after winning the PGA, he skated through the elite field in the NEC Invitational. He was so overcome with lethargy and indifference that he could manage only 21 under par.

And then he was asked to hustle from Ohio to California and get geared up one more time, for Monday night's mostly meaningless prime-time match with Sergio Garcia. By now, Tiger's adrenal glands must be empty.

There was no good reason for him to get the tingles for last night, except of course his considerable pride and the fact that bright lights always seem to stir the best of the performers.

Garcia was identified, hopefully, as one of those who would push Tiger Woods, goad him to greater heights. It has become a popular theory, that Woods needs a Palmer for his Nicklaus.

But what if he really doesn't? What if, in this regard as in so many others, he's different?

We were reminded of how he can respond in the final round of the PGA, when the fearless and little-known Bob May played the competitive round of his gritty life and extended Woods into a riveting playoff.

And yet in his very next tournament, Tiger Woods had no one pushing him and he crushed the field. Ten under is a fine score at Firestone. Ten under against Tiger got you second.

Eleven strokes back.

In that regard, Woods reminds you of Secretariat. Big Red won each of the Triple Crown races by ever-increasing margins, capped by a Belmont Stakes in which he was several city blocks in front. If there had been a fourth major race, he might have lapped the field.

With no one to push him, the horse pushed himself. You detect that trait in the golfer.

Where can he find his motivation? Well, winning the Grand Slam in the same calendar year, for starters.

Then doing it a second time to prove it was no fluke.

Shooting a 59. And then a 58.

Putting up a scoring average for the entire year under 68. Oh, wait, he's in the process of doing that right now. Well, then, a scoring average for the entire year under 67.

What is the equivalent of that in another sport? Maybe an ERA of under 1.00 for an entire season.

Those challenges ought to be enough to occupy him for, oh, the next three years or so.

By then, we'll have thought up some more.

Or he will.

2000, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Visit Philadelphia Online, the Inquirer's World Wide Web site, at http://www.philly.com/
Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Information Services.

Start or Join A Discussion about This Story
Send the URL (Address) of This Story to A Friend:
Enter their email address below:

 AP Sports Headlines


ReporterNewsHomes ReporterNewsCars ReporterNewsJobs ReporterNewsClassifieds BigCountryDining GoFridayNight Marketplace

© 1995- The E.W. Scripps Co. and the Abilene Reporter-News.
All Rights Reserved.
Site users are subject to our User Agreement. We also have a Privacy Policy.